| | 9 APRIL 2025rhythm and tools to monitor, report and manage it. The following scheme provides a high-level view of how risk appetite is managed in practical terms where the desired range for a risk appetite metric to operate is highlighted between Upper and Lower triggers ­ represented by `b' and `c' in the image below:Triggers: acting as early warning indicators, triggers are specific events or conditions that, when breached, indicate a deviation from the desired risk appetite prompting a reassessment of risk levels, review of risk controls, and potential remedial actions to bring the risk back within acceptable limits. Limits: the level of which an immediate escalation and action is required should the company's risk profile is breached. Whenever a metric breaches the upper or lower limit, represented by 'a' and `d', the company's objective is under threat and corrective actions must be taken immediately.Capacity: is defined as the maximum level of risk a company can operate. In case a metric breaches the risk capacity, the company is unviable, and a Recovery/Resolution Plan needs to be enacted. Recovery PlanA recovery and resolution plan, often abbreviated as RRP, is a regulatory requirement for financial institutions to ensure their preparedness in the event of severe financial distress or failure. The main purpose of the plan is to outline strategies and procedures that would enable the institution to recover from financial difficulties and, if necessary, be resolved in an orderly manner without causing systemic disruptions or relying on bailouts.Regulators require financial institutions, especially systemically important ones (SIFIs), to develop and submit recovery and resolution plans as part of their risk management and regulatory compliance efforts. These plans are continually reviewed and updated to reflect changes in the institution's risk profile and evolving regulatory requirements. The ultimate goal is to enhance the resilience of financial institutions and reduce the potential negative impact on the broader financial system in the event of financial distress or failure.ConclusionIn summary, risk appetite management involves a combination of quantitative and qualitative measures to assess, define, and monitor risk levels. Triggers act as early warning indicators, while breaches prompt escalation for appropriate action. By effectively managing risk appetite, financial institutions can strike a balance between pursuing their objectives and maintaining prudent risk management practices.On the other hand, when the risk appetite is not properly utilised, a financial institution may forego various opportunities for growth, innovation, investment, collaboration, and competitive advantage. Striking the right balance between risk and reward is essential to harness the full potential of the opportunities available in the market and achieve long-term success.All in all, the risk appetite reflects how a company articulates its strategy, and the resiliency and success of the business depend on how well it is executed. Quoting Warren Buffett, "Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing.
< Page 8 | Page 10 >